Response From Scott Andrews: Greens Candidate for Morialta

I recently asked the candidates for the South Australian State seat of Morialta some technology questions to find out their views on technology. This was done in the hope of electing a representative for m local electorate who was able to formulate good technology policy. I have received a response from the Greens candidate Scott Andrews which I have reproduced in full below interspersed with some comments.

The Australian Greens (SA) Response

Technology Questionnaire for Blog site

1. What web browser do you use?

Mozilla Firefox.

OK so not Internet Explorer. Someone who is at least aware that there is an option.

2. What is your day to day computer (PC, Apple, Laptop) etc?

PC

3. What social networking sites do you or your staff use (Facebook, Twitter, Others) and where can we find you on those sites?

By Scott:None.

A simple honest respons which nonetheless begs the question why? If you are a candidate in a minor party hoping to oust the sitting member and not having significant resources to do it with why wouldn’t you embrace a medium that is essentially free to get your message out?

4. Do you have a blog and if so what is the address?

No.

Again blogs are easy and free to set up so why not use this as a means to get the message out?
5. In your opinion, what is the role of the internet in the South Australian political process?

The Australian Greens (SA) believe that internet plays a vital role in making the South Australian political process more accessible to the public, and in encouraging community involvement. The internet allows members of the public to view what has been said in Parliament through the publication of the Hansard records, to see how parties and individual politicians have voted on different Bills, and to access copies of every Bill that is debated in Parliament and every Act that is passed by Parliament, all from the Parliament of South Australia website. The internet also allows every party, politician and candidate to have their own website, allowing them to communicate directly with the public, without having to rely on traditional mainstream media.

The Greens believe that with smarter use of the internet and modern technology, which can be seen in the parliamentary websites in other jurisdictions, the South Australian political process can be significantly improved. Measures such as live streaming of question time can make Parliamentary proceedings more accessible, and ideas such as online petitions and online feedback mechanisms would make it easier for individuals and community groups to engage in the political process.

Not a bad response referencing static websites but also showing some awareness of interactivity though not really any specifics. Referencing earlier questions though: if politicians can have their own websites why doesn’t Scott Andrews have one?

6. What role should government play in regulating the internet?

The Greens believe that the role of the Government is to ensure regulation of the internet is transparent, accountable and protects freedom of speech, expression and access to information.

Great response, full marks here.

7. What are your thoughts on how to address objectionable content on the internet? What role should government play in this process?

The Greens do not believe that the Rudd Government’s plan to introduce mandatory internet censorship is the best way to address objectionable content on the internet. There are still numerous problems with the Government’s approach, including technical shortcomings highlighted by a range of experts in the field, issues surrounding the secret contents of the ACMA blacklist, and the potential assault on free speech that the filter represents. Most importantly, we await evidence that the system, as proposed, will do anything to address genuine and valid concerns about children’s access to online pornography.

Also a good response, saying what many know to be true.

8. Do you support an R18+ classification for computer games?

The Greens support the introduction of an R18+ classification for computer games.

Also a good response.

9. What are your thoughts on the funding of computers for schools?

The Greens are in favour of increased Government funding of computers for schools. The Greens strongly oppose corporate sponsorship of schools, including any corporate funding of computers for schools, such as that by guided missile manufacturer Raytheon, which sponsors Aberfoyle Park High School.

In favor of increased funding by government but in favor of reduced corporate funding.

10. Tell us about the policies that your party has that would influence the use of technology if elected.

The Greens believe that the Government should lead by example and embrace open source and open standards, and that documents placed in the public domain by Government should be accessible with free non-proprietary software, and public data should be made available in open, interoperable formats.

This is a great policy. Openness of standards and data makes government more accessible and transparent.

The Greens also believe that public ownership of essential communications infrastructure is in the best interests of a democratic society, and is the best way to ensure that affordable and reliable high speed internet connections are available for all Australians. Furthermore, the Greens will regulate to ensure net neutrality is maintained on the internet.

So, in summary, whilst the Greens overall technology policy is refreshing and progressive there is no indication that Scott Andrews as a candidate has any technical knowledge. The question has to be asked then if he were to be elected in Morialta what impact would he have on technology policy?

No Comments

The Prime Minister’s Health Reform Agenda

I just finished watching the Australian Prime Minister’s speech to the national press club announcing his plan to radically reform the Australian health sector (full report here). I feel that the plan overlooks two critical concerns that could potentially undermine the goals it sets out to achieve.

The plan fails to recognise that splitting administration into smaller local health networks may introduce more duplication of resources as local health boards take on functions that formerly were centralised in state health departments. One of the key areas I see running into this problem is ICT support. South Australia recently centralised its health IT in order to address inefficiencies introduced by fragmentation across hospitals and regions. Mr Rudd’s plan would reintroduce this fragmentation and then replicate it across the country.

The second issue I have is that of accountability. At least at the moment if we have an issue with the way that a state government is running the health system it is an area of focus and we can vote them out at an election, as is likely to happen in New South Wales. By spreading the accountability for health delivery across a number of local health networks the focus of the issue is diluted which decreases the accountability of the state government who appoints the boards and allows the state government to remain at arms length. The potential for mismanagement and local corruption has been increased.

These issues aside I think that the plan shows great vision and a promise of addressing the large hole in health funding coming through Australia’s aging population and the rise in health costs.

The award for the worst question after the speech goes to the Adelaide Advertiser who completely ignored the health agenda and asked some lame question about Tony Abbott getting lost in the desert. The Prime Minister gave some motherhood response and the discussion moved on with barely a ripple in the intellectual landscape. If this is the standard of newspaper journalism that the Advertiser promotes then it is no wonder they are under threat from online sources.

Tags: , ,

No Comments

Website Technical Design Principles

I’ve recently become involved in assiting an organisation to add a little bit of technical rigour to their brief for the redesign of their website. As a part of this I’m developing some technical principles to guide the technical requirements. I’ve listed the principles below:

  1. The website shall be developed in such a way as to allow maintenance by persons other than the successful bidder.
  2. The design of the website shall allow future enhancements to take into account changing requirements, technology and standards without requiring a rewrite.
  3. The website shall allow the content to be edited and maintained by the client without the need to engage external parties to do so.
  4. The website shall be accessible to the widest possible audience and shall not prevent access by people with disabilities or access by persons using commonly used technology.
  5. The website shall be designed in such a way as to promote favorable ranking in common search engines.
  6. The website shall be designed to prevent modification of its contents by unauthorised users.

I think these form a pretty good basis for good technical website design.

Tags: ,

1 Comment

Response from Gay Thompson: Member for Reynell

Damien Mason posted a response to my post on Technology and the South Australian Election from Gay Thompson, the sitting member for the seat of Reynell. I’m going to repost sections of that response here and provide some analysis and commentary.

Damien

Thank you for your message.

Because of the impending election it is important that all information provided to the community about the policies of the party of which I am a member are clear and consistent. For this reason, and especially because many of the questions you ask relate to powers held by the Federal government, I have forwarded your message to our policy coordinators.

OK stop right there. Of the questions I posed only questions 6 and 7 could be construed as federal policy and all that was being asked was a personal opinion. The others were either personal questions designed to get a picture of a candidate’s use of technology or South Australian state issues. There was no attempt to answer the specific policy questions.

The IT I have available is provided by the Department of Finance as part of the package they supply (phones, photocopiers etc) to enable members of Parliament to do their jobs. Within the choices that are available to members, I chose a laptop rather than a PC. I also make full use of an HTC Diamond for emails, calendar etc.

OK

While I recognise that some of my constituents may like to make use of the new technologies for communication my investigations indicate that this is a very small number. Indeed, you are the first to seek information on the topic. However, I monitor the situation in order to provide relevant information and to maximise my accessibility to my constituents.

Few respondents to my recent survey of constituents provided an email address although they were invited to do so. Emails to my office from constituents are also less frequent than letters or personal visits with telephone calls (with landline contact details), by far the main method of contact. I use web based material such as the City of Onkaparinga Social Atlas for information. This material shows that in general the suburbs I represent have lower internet connection than either the City of Onkaparinga or the Adelaide Statistical Division. I have included the site for you.

http://atlas.id.com.au/DefaultMap.aspx?id=119&pg=2010&c=3070&t=10075#empty-anchor

What this is saying is that not many of the constituents in Reynell have the internet or, if they do, they don’t choose to connect with their local member this way. Therefore it is more productive to use traditional means of communication. I don’t buy this. The penetration of Facebook alone in the Adelaide region is huge and I suspect that the constituents in Reynell are no exception.

Accordingly, I use my limited resources to provide regular communication to my constituents in the traditional formats.

Being able to communicate electronically and in real time surely is more efficient than more manual processes and therefore a better use of resources.

Other information is available through the government and party websites. I contribute financially to the operation of the ALP website so that constituents who choose this method can access policy information. I am also pleased that recent government initiatives will allow better internet access through Adam to some areas in the South.

Use of static websites that allow one way broadcast communication.

I cannot commit to a time frame for additional responses as many people ask questions on a vast array of topics at this time and it is important that each individual get a clear response consistent with the party’s plans for action if elected.

Yes this is a lot of information for one elector to ask and yes this is a busy time.

I hope the information I have provided assists you.

Gay Thompson MP
MEMBER FOR REYNELL

From this we can glean that Ms Thompson uses a laptop and a smartphone, has a knowledge of email and of static websites. She does not seem to have a knowledge of social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter. There is nothing in the response above that would indicate a willingness to promote good technology policy within government.

For an incumbent in a safe Labor seat this is probably enough to win but it shows a complacency that would be vulnerable to an opponent who can work smarter to engage with the electorate. It will be interesting to see what the other candidates can do.

Tags: , , , ,

No Comments

SA’s A-G steps up fight with video gamers

I read this this morning: SA’s A-G steps up fight with video gamers – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) and I had to comment.

No-one in Australia should be subject  to threats of intimidation this way. We have a political process and significant freedom of speech. There is no excuse for resorting to these sort of tactics to try and put a political view.  Not only that it weakens the argument by allowing Mr Atkinson to characterise all those who hold a view that R18+ video games should be allowed by the actions of a few bad apples.

I may have different views from Mr Atkinson on a number of points but I respect his right to express an opinion. He and his family should feel safe in their home.

Update: More details on the threats to Mr Atkinson from News Limited.


Tags: , ,

No Comments

Technology and the South Australian State Election

Recent controversy surrounding the attorney general Michael Atkinson’s attempts to censor the internet have made one thing abundantly clear: we are served by a bunch of politicians who have no idea about technology. With a South Australian state election coming up on march 20th I’d like to do something to change that. What I propose is this: That a list of technology questions be sent to each candidate for the election and the results published.

I propose to do this for the seat of Morialta which is the one I live in and publish the results here. I will offer to link to any other posts that do the same for other electorates.

I don’t seriously think that this effort will unseat Michael Atkinson in Croydon but I do think that technology is an issue that affects many people’s lives and we owe it to ourselves to elect as many people as we can who actually have a clue what is going on. To that end here is my draft list of questions, comments are welcome:

  1. What web browser do you use?
  2. What is your day to day computer (PC, Apple, Laptop) etc?
  3. What social networking sites do you or your staff use (Facebook, Twitter, Others) and where can we find you on those sites?
  4. Do you have a blog and if so what is the address
  5. In your opinion, what is the role of the internet in the South Australian political process?
  6. What role should government play in regulating the internet?
  7. What are your thoughts on how to address objectionable content on the internet? What role should government play in this process?
  8. Do you support an R18+ classification for computer games?
  9. Tell us about the policies that your party has that would influence the use of technology if elected.

Update:
Question suggested by @lordfolland on Twitter:
What are your thoughts on the funding of computers for schools?

Other Electorates:
The following people have offered to do other electorates:

Davenport
Alex Prichard (@azp74)
Enfield
Mark Limburg (@Wyld)
Newland
David Folland (@lordfolland)
Norwood
appsii (@appsii)
Reynell
Damien Mason (@chimpocalypse)

Tags: , , , ,

3 Comments

Updated Tintagel Object Model

I have updated the UML object model for Tintagel in line with revision 8 in the Tintagel source repository:

I added Nodes, Content Types, Fields, Field Values and Data Types. The idea behind Tintagel is to have a really clean object model without a lot of little exceptions like the ones that can be found in Drupal where the number of database tables storing content data gets larger by the minute. To that end Tintagel will have Nodes to represent content and everything will be a node (menus, comments, everything). Nodes will have a Content Type. Content Types will have Fields that have a Data Type describing the sort of data in the field. Nodes will contain Field Values that point back to the Content Type.

Those familiar with Drupal will see the ideas behind the Views and CCK modules coming through in the Tintagel core.

2 Comments

Announcing Project Tintagel: A Grails CMS

I would like to announce that I have created a Google code project to start putting together the ideas for the Grails CMS that I have devised. The name of the project is Tintagel. Why Tintagel? Well Tintagel will be loosely based on the ideas in the Drupal CMS. As the story goes when Dries Buytaert was choosing the domain name for his CMS project he mistyped the word dorp which is Dutch for village and ended up with drop.org which later became Drupal (see the Drupal history for the full story). Tintagel is based on the Grails framework and the village most associated with the legend of the Holy Grail is Tintagel in Corwall UK.

I am definitely looking for help on this project as the scope of the ideas I have is much greater than the time I have available to work on it so if you have the time to help drop me a note in the comments.

Tags: , ,

1 Comment

First Thoughts On a Grails CMS Object Model

I’ve been thinking of writing a Grails based CMS that will be loosely based on Drupal. The main aim will be to have a very clean MVC separation and to add features using Grails plugins. To that end I have been thinking about an object model for the site which I have drawn below:

A Template is a layout of regions. Each theme will have a number of templates (which may be only one) A region can have an existence apart from a template so a region on a particular template is called a Template region. Each template region has a context and can have 0 or more blocks to display content. The blocks use the context to decide what to display. A page is an instance of a template with a number of region instances. Each region instance can have a mode such as view or edit.

I haven’t yet decided which parts of this object model will not be represented in the database but rather in template files as tag parameters.

Tags: , , ,

2 Comments

Grails and Netbeans: How do I Put Domain Classes in Packages?

I downloaded NetBeans to work on my open source project in Grails and one of the first things I noticed is that the Grails plugin doesn’t support creating domain classes in packages. This seems a little bit weird to me and it has left me wondering if I should copy the classes manually into package folders and add the import statements or whether I should give up and have them in the default package. The plugin seems to recognise domain classes in packages just fine but it won’t let you crete them through the wizard. Weird.

Tags:

1 Comment