As you may or may not be aware I have been doing quite a bit of work this election campaign on determining the technology policies of the parties and candidates in this federal election. After doing quite a bit of research I have come to a decision on the way that I will be voting tomorrow.
I’ll be voting Labor.
Why? The primary reason is the National Broadband Network. Labor’s plan to build the NBN will deliver a service to Australia that will improve economic growth and reestablish Australia as a global leader in internet connectivity. It will enable the development of new internet applications that will enrich our lives. In the past improvements in internet speeds have seen an explosion of new internet applications that the new speeds have made possible. Can you imagine YouTube on dialup?
In addition the NBN will finally break the stranglehold that Telstra has on telephone exchanges and promote a level playing field for internet retailers. The recent fine levied on Telstra for anti-competitive behaviour in this area just shows how Telstra has abused its power in this area and how much that abuse is ingrained in its culture. Labor’s NBN proposal will finally fix this problem.
The coalition’s plan will leave Telstra in control of exchanges and perpetuate the mess that exists now. It will promote duplication of infrastructure in the major metropolitan areas whilst leaving outer suburban, regional and country areas without decent service and speeds. The coalition’s contention that $43 Billion is too much to pay (the actual figure will be much less due to the deal that the government did with Telstra) will pale into insignificance when the cost of providing duplicate private broadband infrastructures is taken into account. The shortsighted statements by coalition figures that Australians don’t need faster broadband speeds shows just how backward looking they are.
But what of the other issues?
I applaud the coalition’s stance on mandatory internet filtering however I think that Stephen Conroy has received the message loud and clear that what is being proposed is bad policy and I believe that the final filter proposal will be watered down. The litmus test of the policy will be whether or not sites like WikiLeaks are blocked by the filter.
The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) frankly scares me and I think that not enough attention has been focussed on this treaty yet. If Labor is re-elected I will be doing what I can to try and raise awareness of what this treaty means to our civil liberties.
Electronic health records are also a professional interest of mine and I think the Labor party’s support for them is a good thing although details on how they will be implemented are scarce.
In terms of preferences I will be putting the coalition as number 2 because quite frankly the choice of the paedophile, the racist, the baby killers, the disconnected incompetents and the LDP don’t inspire me.
I’ll probably vote for the coalition in the senate as they oppose the filter and are more likely to oppose ACTA.
It has certainly been an interesting campaign from a technology perspective and I will certainly be glued to the ABC tomorrow night with Twitter open on the laptop to see what happens.
GeoURL
Subscribe
#1 by Aj on August 20th, 2010
| Quote
I understand the arguments, re: wresting control of the exchanges from Tel$tra and putting them back in the public’s control, however the NBN will *NOT* be providing me any benefit, 25 minutes from Adelaide CBD, due to the fact my township is supposedly too small. Telstra wireless even sucks where we are.
Also? the filter will negate any speed benefits you may receive from the proposed network.
Now, as well as all this, why should I pay for an NBN (taxes), when the real benefit will go to the ISP’s. Let them build their own networks – that is what *free* market is all about.
Aj
#2 by yellek on August 20th, 2010
| Quote
Yes but do you think that the coalition’s plan will deliver anything better to you? Also the filter has not been proven to significantly affect speeds and would certainly not make a dent in 100MBPS, let alone 1GBPS. There is no way the filter will bring fibre down to a speed similar to ADSL. As regards “why should I pay for the filter?”, you will receive a service. The current ISP’s aren’t really interested in building services to your area because the economics for them aren’t in it. They don’t have cross subsidies. This is evidenced by your crappy service. The alternative is that the Australian economy will be asked to pay more for service that is patchy and won’t help you with your connectivity problem.
#3 by Aj on August 20th, 2010
| Quote
It is not up to the Government to provide *anything*.
As I said, I will not get the service, as I fall outside of the scope of the NBN. The NBN has stated that they will not be building in my area either.
What should happen (IMNSHO) is that the infrastructure arm of Tel$tra should be taken back by the gov, then rented back to whoever wants it. After all we paid for that stuff to be put in the ground.
Mawson Lakes in Adelaide is a great case in point, Brand new Suburb – all houses *must* be wired internally to support networking to all rooms, by way of encumberances – so all houses in ML are wired this way, but can you get fibre? no, can you get ADSL? no. even the 3G wireless is flakey there. However there are people providing DECENT wireless there and are making a fortune doing it, why? because they put in the infrastructure. ML is one of the highest density suburbs in Adelaide, so why did Telstra not put in infrastructure when they were building the suburb (and they promised to do?) – because they were punishing the Gov, to show that if the then (lib) NBN broadband plan goes ahead, that they will stop doing infrastructure.
The point I guess I am trying to make is that Gov interference in this, will just remove incentive from these big companies to do any infrastructure.
If GOV are going to do anything at all? it has to be done for EVERYONE, not for 93% of the people – TAKE BACK infrastructure (POTS, ADSL, CABLE, Exchanges, links between exchanges) from Telstra, and rent it out reasonable to anyone who wants it, put in ADSL equip in every RIM/EXCHANGE australia wide so as to serve everyone in that area, and allow all ISP’s to have access.
The problem then, is that the gov has no incentive to increase speeds. – We will be like Soviet Russia – everyone gets something, but never quite what they need.
I still believe that no gov should get involved. it will be counter productive.
ISPs today are putting their own equipment in to exchanges (anecdotal evidence suggests, this is with much argument from telstra) today. – will this continue once the NBN is started? I doubt it.
Sorry for my rambling, I hope I got my point across, and good luck.
Aj